-
摘要:从多个方面分析了棱镜和光栅色散分光的优缺点,分析结果表明棱镜更适于星载高分辨率超光谱成像仪的分光。在透过率方面,棱镜光谱仪透过率高达95.24%(VNIR),而光栅的衍射效率仅为60%~70%。在杂散光方面,棱镜光谱仪的杂散光可达10-4,而光栅的杂散光为10-2。在0.4 -2.5 范围,棱镜光谱仪相对光栅光谱仪有优越性。在色散线性方面,光栅光谱仪基本线性,棱镜光谱仪的短波非线性问题可通过复合棱镜进行补偿。可靠性方面,棱镜光谱仪较光栅光谱仪有优势;在光谱带宽和成本方面,棱镜光谱仪与光栅光谱仪基本接近。Abstract:The paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of dispersion method between prism and grating from some different points of view. The result indicates that the prism is more suitable for space-borne high resolution hyper-spectrum imager. The transmission efficiency of spectrometers with prisms is 95.24%(VNIR) and the diffraction efficiency of grating is between 60% and 70%. Moreover, the stray light of spectrometers with prisms is 10-4 and that of spectrometers with grating is 10-2. Furthermore the spectrometers with prisms is better than the spectrometers with grating between 0.4 -2.5 .In the dispersion linearity aspect, the spectrometers with grating are linear. The nonlinear problem of shortwave for spectrometers with prisms can be solved through double-prisms. Spectrometers with prisms are more reliable than Spectrometers with grating. In the spectrum bandwidth and cost aspect, Spectrometers with prisms and grating are equivalent.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数:4221
- HTML全文浏览量:452
- PDF下载量:2375
- 被引次数:0