留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

国外地球同步轨道目标天基光学监视策略

牛照东,汪琳,段宇,潘嘉蒙,陈曾平

downloadPDF
牛照东, 汪琳, 段宇, 潘嘉蒙, 陈曾平. 国外地球同步轨道目标天基光学监视策略[J]. , 2017, 10(3): 310-320. doi: 10.3788/CO.20171003.0310
引用本文: 牛照东, 汪琳, 段宇, 潘嘉蒙, 陈曾平. 国外地球同步轨道目标天基光学监视策略[J]. , 2017, 10(3): 310-320.doi:10.3788/CO.20171003.0310
NIU Zhao-dong, WANG Lin, DUAN Yu, PAN Jia-meng, CHEN Zeng-ping. Review of foreign space-based optical surveillance strategies for GEO objects[J]. Chinese Optics, 2017, 10(3): 310-320. doi: 10.3788/CO.20171003.0310
Citation: NIU Zhao-dong, WANG Lin, DUAN Yu, PAN Jia-meng, CHEN Zeng-ping. Review of foreign space-based optical surveillance strategies for GEO objects[J].Chinese Optics, 2017, 10(3): 310-320.doi:10.3788/CO.20171003.0310

国外地球同步轨道目标天基光学监视策略

doi:10.3788/CO.20171003.0310
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目61605243

详细信息
    作者简介:

    牛照东(1982-), 男, 山东邹城人, 博士, 副研究员, 2004年、2010年于国防科技大学分别获得硕士、博士学位, 主要从事光学图像自动目标识别和空间目标探测信息处理方面的研究。E-mail:niuzd@nudt.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    牛照东, E-mail:niuzd@nudt.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号:P171.3

Review of foreign space-based optical surveillance strategies for GEO objects

Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China61605243

  • 摘要:空间目标观测策略是决定天基光学监视系统性能的关键因素之一,本文对国外已服役和在研的GEO目标天基光学监视系统及其观测策略进行了讨论。首先,概述了GEO目标天基光学监视技术的发展历程;然后,简要分析了GEO目标的轨道特性,并在此基础上讨论了主流的GEO目标监视策略;最后,针对近年来呈现出的监视系统小型化和自主运行的发展趋势,对SBO载荷与3U CubeSat星座的目标监视性能进行了仿真评估。实验结果表明:SBO载荷和CubeSat卫星均可探测1 m直径的GEO目标,单颗SBO载荷探测GEO目标比例大于51%,观测弧长和重访周期分别约1.2°和1.5天,CubeSat星座则可探测超过90%的GEO目标,平均观测弧长和重访周期分别大于67.1°和小于0.4天。由此可见微小卫星通过组网能实现对GEO目标的独立自主监视。

  • 图 1SBV传感器

    Figure 1.SBV sensor

    图 2SBSS Block 10空间监视卫星

    Figure 2.SBSS Block 10 space surveillance satellite

    图 3Sapphire小型空间监视卫星图

    Figure 3.Sapphire space surveillance minisatellite

    图 4NEOSSat微型空间监视验证卫星

    Figure 4.NEOSSat space surveillance demonstration microsatellite

    图 5SBO载荷望远镜图

    Figure 5.Telescope of the SBO payload

    图 63U CubeSat卫星示意图

    Figure 6.3U CubeSat concept design

    图 7GEO目标轨道半长轴和偏心率分布情况

    Figure 7.Semi major axis and eccentricity distribution of GEO objects

    图 8GEO目标轨道倾角和升交点赤经演变规律

    Figure 8.Inclination and RAAN evolution rule of GEO objects

    图 9GEO目标轨迹汇聚的收缩点区域[8]

    Figure 9.Pinch-point region with a high concentration of GEO objects[8]

    图 10SBV载荷“收缩点”搜索模式示意图[8]

    Figure 10.Pinch-point searching mode of the SBV payload[8]

    图 11SBO望远镜覆盖的地球同步轨道带区域

    Figure 11.Covered region in the GEO belt from the SBO telescope

    图 123U CubeSat星座结构和GEO目标监视场景

    Figure 12.3U CubeSat constellation architecture and GEO objects surveillance scenario

    图 13SBO观测GEO目标的距离和角速度分布

    Figure 13.Distance and angular velocity distribution of GEO objects detected by the SBO sensor

    图 14不同星等GEO目标成像SNR随天光背景星等变化

    Figure 14.SNR of GEO object with different visual magnitude as function of sky background brightness

    图 15不同太阳相位角时SBO探测目标直径随观测距离变化

    Figure 15.Diamater of spherical object detected by the SBO sensor under different phase angle as function of distance

    图 16不同观测距离下3U CubeSat卫星载荷探测目标直径

    Figure 16.Diamater of spherical object detected by the 3U CubeSat as function of distance

    图 17SBO载荷与CubeSat星座对GEO目标观测弧长和重访周期

    Figure 17.Covered arc length and reacquisition period of GEO objects detected by the SBO payload and the CubeSat constellation

    表 1SBO载荷与CubeSat星座覆盖和探测GEO目标的数量

    Table 1.Numbers of GEO objects covered and detected by the SBO payload and the CubeSat constellation

    GEO目标覆盖与探测数量 春分五日 夏至五日 秋分五日 冬至五日
    SBO载荷 覆盖 1 128(98.1%) 1 142(99.3%) 1 130(98.3%) 674(58.6%)
    探测 1 023(89.0%) 1 037(90.2%) 1 029(89.5%) 587(51.0%)
    CubeSat星座 覆盖 1 118(97.2%) 1 118(97.2%) 1 118(97.2%) 1 118(97.2%)
    探测 1 045(90.9%) 1 038(90.3%) 1 045(90.9%) 1 044(90.8%)
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 张景旭.国外地基光电系统空间目标探测的进展[J].中国光学, 2009, 2(1):10-16.//www.illord.com/CN/abstract/abstract8366.shtml

    ZHANG J X. Progress in foreign ground-based optoelectronic detecting system for space target detection[J].Chinese Optis, 2009, 2(1):10-16.(in Chinese)//www.illord.com/CN/abstract/abstract8366.shtml
    [2] NASA Orbital Debris Program Office. Satellite collision leaves significant debris clouds[EB/OL].[2016-10-15].https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/quarterly-news/newsletter.html.
    [3] 王秀红, 李俊峰, 王彦荣.天基照相机监测空间目标定轨方法及精度分析[J].光学精密工程, 2013, 21(6):1394-1403.http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXJM201306005.htm

    WANG X H, LI J F, WANG Y R. Orbit determination and precision analysis of space object with space-based camera[J].Opt. Precision Eng., 2013, 21(6):1394-1403.(in Chinese)http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXJM201306005.htm
    [4] 吴连大.人造卫星与空间碎片的轨道和观测[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社, 2011.

    WU L D.Orbit and Observation of Artificial Satellite and Space Debris[M]. Beijing:China Science and Technology Press, 2011.(in Chinese)
    [5] HUEBSCHMAN R K. The MSX spacecraft system design[J].Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 1996, 17(1):41-48.http://www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/TD/td1701/huebsch.pdf
    [6] DAVID C H, JOSEPH C C. The space-based visible sensor[J].Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 1996, 17(2):226-236.http://www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/TD/td1702/harrison.pdf
    [7] GRANT H S, CURT V B, RAMASWAMY S,et al.. The space-based visible program[J].Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 1998, 11(2):205-238.
    [8] JAYANT S, GRANT H S, CURT V B,et al.. Toward operational space-based space surveillance[J].Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 2002, 13(2):309-334.
    [9] The Boeing Company. Space based space surveillance revolutionizing space awareness[EB/OL].[2016.08.20].http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/satellite/MissionBook.pdf.
    [10] Defence Research and Development Canada. Space-based observations of satellites from the MOST microsatellite[R]. Ottawa:DRDC, 2006.
    [11] PAUL M, LORNE O. Sapphire.Canada's answer to space-based surveillance of orbital objects[C]. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Conference, Hawaii, USA, 2008:1-8.
    [12] HACKETT J, BRISBY R, SMITH K. Overview of the Sapphire payload for space surveillance[J].SPIE, 2012, 8385:83850W-11.https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/spie/overview-of-the-sapphire-payload-for-space-surveillance-SlIU4ktpyx
    [13] SCOTT A, HACKETT J, MAN K. On-orbit results for Canada's Sapphire optical payload[C]. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Conference, Hawaii, USA, 2013:1-7.
    [14] WALLACE B, PINKNEY F, SCOTT R,et al.. The near earth object surveillance satellite (NEOSSat)[J].SPIE, 2004, 5578:1-7.http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004SPIE.5578....1W
    [15] WALLACE B, SCOTT R, BEDARD D,et al.. The near-earth orbit surveillance satellite[J].SPIE, 2006, 6265:626526-10.
    [16] SCOTT R, WALLACE B, SALE M,et al.. Toward microsatellite based space situational awareness[C]. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Conference, Hawaii, USA, 2013:1-10.
    [17] KRUTZ U, JAHN H, K HRT E,et al.. Radiometric considerations for the detection of space debris with an optical sensor in LEO as a secondary goal of the Asteroid Finder mission[J].Acta Astronautica, 2011, 69:297-306.doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.04.003
    [18] FINDLAY R, E MANN O, GRUNDMANN J T,et al.. A space-based mission to characterize the IEO population[J].Acta Astronautica, 2013, 90:33-40.doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.08.004
    [19] United States Naval Observatory. Joint Milli-Arcsecond Pathfinder Survey (J-MAPS) Mission:the application of high metric accuracy astrometry to space situational awareness[R]. Washington:USNO, 2006.
    [20] United States Naval Observatory. The Joint Milli-Arcsecond Pathfinder Survey (J-MAPS) Mission:Application for Space Situational Awareness[R]. Washington:USNO, 2008.
    [21] FLOHRER T, PELTONEN J, KRAMER A,et al.. Space-based optical observations of space debris[C]. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany:ECSD, 2005:165-170.
    [22] FLOHRER T, KRAG H, KLINKRAD H,et al.. Feasibility of performing space surveillance tasks with a proposed space-based optical architecture[J].Advances in Space Research, 2011, 47:1029-1042.doi:10.1016/j.asr.2010.11.021
    [23] MORRIS K, RICE C, WOLFSON M. CubeSat integration into the space situational awareness architecture[C]. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Conference, Hawaii, USA:AMOS, 2013:1-11.
    [24] MORRIS K, RICE C, LITTLE E. Relative cost and performance comparison of GEO space situational awareness architectures[C]. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Conference, Hawaii, USA:AMOS, 2014:1-11.
    [25] FLOHRER T, SCHILDKNECHT T, MUSCI R. Proposed strategies for optical observations in a future European space surveillance network[J].Advances in Space Research, 2008, 41:1010-1021.doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.018
    [26] 周美江, 朱振才, 杨根庆, 等.天基光学同步带目标监视跟踪模式[J].中国空间科学技术, 2015, 32(3):35-43.http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKJ201503006.htm

    ZHOU M J, ZHU Z C, YANG G Q,et al.. GEO objects surveillance and tracking mode of space-based optical system[J].Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2015, 32(3):35-43.(in Chinese)http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKJ201503006.htm
    [27] 陈冰儿, 熊建宁.空间碎片天基光学观测平台设计[J].天文学报, 2016, 57(2):228-240.http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TWXB201602010.htm

    CHEN B E, XIONG J N. The platform design of space-based optical observations of space debris[J]. Acta Astronomica Sinica, 2016, 57(2):228-240.(in Chinese)http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TWXB201602010.htm
    [28] HU Y P, LI K B, XU W. A novel space-based observation strategy for GEO objects based on daily pointing adjustment of multi-sensors[J].Advances in Space Research, 2016, 58:505-513.doi:10.1016/j.asr.2016.05.023
  • 加载中
图(17)/ 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:2293
  • HTML全文浏览量:841
  • PDF下载量:964
  • 被引次数:0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-09
  • 修回日期:2017-02-28
  • 刊出日期:2017-06-01

目录

    /

      返回文章
      返回
        Baidu
        map